<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="fi">
	<id>http://www.harrika.fi/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=W2cfira026</id>
	<title>Motopedia - Käyttäjän muokkaukset [fi]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.harrika.fi/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=W2cfira026"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.harrika.fi/wiki/index.php?title=Toiminnot:Muokkaukset/W2cfira026"/>
	<updated>2026-06-27T06:18:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Käyttäjän muokkaukset</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.5</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.harrika.fi/wiki/index.php?title=2015cv05345_Document_1424_S_D_N_Y_2021&amp;diff=175916</id>
		<title>2015cv05345 Document 1424 S D N Y 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.harrika.fi/wiki/index.php?title=2015cv05345_Document_1424_S_D_N_Y_2021&amp;diff=175916"/>
		<updated>2023-08-09T23:04:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;W2cfira026: Ak: Uusi sivu: Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER re: 1243 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument on 1231 Objection to 1221 Order grant­i­ng sanc­tions addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Matthew L. Schwartz dat­ed 4/17/20. filed by City of Almaty, BTA Ba nk JSC. For the fore­go­ing rea­sons, the Court over­rules the Kazakh Entities’ objec­tions (Dkt. No. 1231) to Judge Parker’s March 12, 2020 Opinion. The Kazakh Entities’ motion for oral argu­ment (Dkt. No. 1243) is...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER re: 1243 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument on 1231 Objection to 1221 Order grant­i­ng sanc­tions addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Matthew L. Schwartz dat­ed 4/17/20. filed by City of Almaty, BTA Ba nk JSC. For the fore­go­ing rea­sons, the Court over­rules the Kazakh Entities’ objec­tions (Dkt. No. 1231) to Judge Parker’s March 12, 2020 Opinion. The Kazakh Entities’ motion for oral argu­ment (Dkt. No. 1243) is DENIED as moot. This resolves Docket Numbers 1231 and 1243. (As [https://www.opendemocracy.net/ here] fur­ther set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/29/2021) (cf)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
window.tgpQueue.add('tgpli-64a7df3eb5ddc')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the Court con­cludes that Judge Parker did not clear­ly err in the sanc­tions she imposed. The par­ties had exten­sive­ly lit­i­gat­ed whether the Kazakh Entities would be allowed to make use of wit­ness­es they did not time­ly dis­close. Judge Parker care­ful­ly bal­anced the inter­ests of the par­ties by allow­ing the Kazakh Entities to amend their Rule 26 dis­clo­sures but lim­it­ing their depo­si­tion ques­tion­ing to issues relat­ed to the rea­son she allowed the late dis­clo­sures— name­ly, authen­ti­cat­ing and lay­ing foun­da­tion for admis­sion of the spreadsheets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Download PDF&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>W2cfira026</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>